Talk:Pan South African Language Board

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

South Africa

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Repeated Reversions[edit]

ZyXoas, you've discussed these changes before in many articles and the consensus was that you were using the incorrect spelling. Please don't buck the consensus.

We can hardly accept "Sesotho sa Leboa" as the correct English for "Northern Sotho". Wiki is in English, not Sotho!

Other language articles use the accepted English words, so why are you trying to create a problem where there should not be?

There is a rule called the 3RR (3 Revert Rule) rule - as I have explained to you before. Please make yourself aware of it before you get blocked. Thanks 196.30.118.76 19:08, 24 April 2007 (UTC) DawnTreader[reply]

The constitutional status of South African Sign Language[edit]

The section of the SA constitution that establishes the PanSALB does not specifically mention SASL. It actually uses the phrase "sign language" in the generic sense. The lack of upper case initials is sikgnificant. Roger (talk) 14:20, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]