Talk:Lui (surname)

Chronological vs. alphabetical order

Several discussions at WP:ANTHROPONYMY have not produced any strong consensus on enforcing either alphabetical or birth-year order of entries on name pages:

• Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Anthroponymy/Archive_4#Regarding_the_order_of_names_on_name_pages
• Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Anthroponymy/Standards#Proposal:_Sorting_by_birth_year,_death_year_and_alphabetically_with_a_sortable_table
• Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Anthroponymy/Archive_6#Format_for_lists_of_people
• Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Anthroponymy/Archive_8#Strange_list_format

Similarly, MOS:DABORDER does not mandate either alphabetical or chronological order: Within each section, entries should be ordered to best assist the reader in finding their intended article. Entries are typically ordered first by similarity to the ambiguous title, then alphabetically or chronologically as appropriate. (Yes, WP:SETNOTDAB, but there are generally similarities between how the two types of pages are structured.)

Given that there are arguments for both (alphabetical order may be more convenient for editors, but it's useless for readers - since if they're on a surname page and trying to find a specific individual, pretty clearly they don't know that person's given name, otherwise they'd just go to the person's article directly), and no strong consensus either way, the best thing to do for the moment is not to change the order around when you come across a page that's already been sorted one way. Regards, 59.149.124.29 (talk) 02:12, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

liu misspelling

since "liu" is one of the most common names in mandarin, aren't there a certain %age of luis who simply got the spelling flipped around during immigration, ellis island, etc? if i had a name like "simth", that would be my first assumption. 2601:19C:527E:56C0:1902:9F21:A065:1B0 (talk) 16:12, 21 May 2024 (UTC)