This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Lookseeau asked for a review of the description of Schellenberg's hiddenness argument; the question is how Schellenberg can know that a God would be perfectly loving. The basic response is that this article is only summarizing Schellenberg's argument, not saying that the argument is right or that Schellenberg knows what he says in it. But it would be useful to show that Schellenberg is working with a common philosophical idea of God, which defines God as a perfect or unsurpassably great personal being. So I have added something about this to the article. Thanks to Lookseeau for prompting this change.
With this response, I have also removed Lookseeau's request for a review, which was inserted into the article.
Rmtcoupar (talk) 13:33, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
