Talk:Emotional isolation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kenziewalker22. Peer reviewers: Lkopcalic, Jlope487, Dorry92.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:31, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is it?[edit]

The article doesn't really define what emotional isolation is. Emotional isolation cannot be defined as a state of isolation where someone is emotionally isolated. It's like saying that yellow is a color that is yellow. Capitan Obvio 10:52, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really get what is the difference between emotional isolation and loneliness (if there is one).

yes. and..[edit]

True. Plus it would be nice if the article would also deal with emotional isolation among young people. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.86.9.34 (talk) 13:42, 24 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]


It would also be nice if there was an animated gif in the article depicting a force of ninjas defeating emotional isolation after a pitched battle, the state of emotion embodied for the purposes of dramatization in the form of a hairy bigfoot-like creature. —Preceding unsigned comment added by INTOTHEGRIP (talkcontribs) 21:03, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Contradiction?[edit]

...emotionally isolated, but may have a well functioning social network.

I would think a well-functioning social network would provide emotional support, otherwise it wouldn't be "well-functioning". Maybe some re-wording might help here. If a person is emotionally isolated in a well-functioning social support system, there is something else going on that this definition is missing. --DanielCD (talk) 16:26, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review[edit]

I think you're going in the right direction however, I do not think it's wise to use the word to describe the word. I suggest using a different definition or rephrasing it so you avoid using the same word in the definition. Other than that, it looks good. Jlope487 (talk) 04:03, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]