Talk:Ee ja nai ka

Japan Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 17:12, May 23, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ee ja nai ka article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Date[edit]

Date right? I've found 1868 instead. Charles Matthews 15:16, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oops you are right, I checked with the Japanese Wikipedia article and it does say from 1867 to 1868. Thanks for the correction - feel free to edit the page if you want to . --DannyWilde 00:47, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

spelling[edit]

The phonetically correct spelling would be closer to "ei ja nai ka", rather than "ee ja nai ka", the latter when pronounced by English speakers forms a long E sound, which is incorrect.

Interestingly, in this very same article a film is mentioned by the same name, but spelled in the phonetically correct construction.

I don't know a whole lot about Romaji configurations, other than that there are 2 widely used and a few more obscure ones. Perhaps the original author was using one of the obscure configurations, but for continuity's sake, I think the spelling should be changed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.28.179.6 (talk) 16:11, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

English translation of term[edit]

"The term ee ja nai ka ("Hey, what the hell!" or "Isn't great?")" Could this be changed to "Isn't it great"? CopaceticThought (talk) 10:40, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the literal meaning to the article lede. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │^{Tala við mig} 04:40, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Additional Sources[edit]

Source for the movement eventually descending into mob violence? There is bound to be some documentation for those incidents. Conrad Totman's book, Early Modern Japan has a small mention of ee ja nai ka that is not quite mob violence. It also mentions that some would participate to spite people they hated or as a form of revenge. Clmn3 (talk) 13:01, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]