Talk:Duke of Kendal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Should this page list the holders of the Barony of Kendal?[edit]

The following comment was appended to the article on 15 February 2016 by an anonymous editor:

THE BARON KENDAL remained in my family for three centuries yet you have skipped over William John Thomas William all Parr family holders of that said title. It was my ancestor who granted the ruins of his castle in Kendal to the people of that town around 1890. I am Baronet Parr and correct your mistakes here by made. Also you fail to mention IVO De Taboliose who was the first Baron kendal His castle was on Beast banks in that old grey town long prior to Sir William Parr Baron Kendal restored or rebuilt that castle we see today as ruin .Campden the historian around 1500 said that Parrs castle was falling down with age even then as Sir Thomas parr had moved his family to Blackfriars London where Queen Kateryn Parr was born in Sept 1512.

Being inappropriate content for an article, I have moved this note to the talk page. As the article on the Barony of Kendal covers most (if not all) of his points, I have edited the "See also" to point to that article.

N.B.: I can find no reference to any "Parr baronets" whatsoever in the usual sources (e.g., Leigh Rayment).

--LibertyHiller (talk) 17:51, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Duke of Kendal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:01, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]