This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupations, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OccupationsWikipedia:WikiProject OccupationsTemplate:WikiProject OccupationsOccupations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Why is this marked as a stub? Is there really more that could be said about a castellan? If someone feels that way, wouldn't the article be better served by making note of such on the talk page or something like that rather than simply puting a stub tag up and moving on? Banaticus 23:51, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There is quite a bit more to be said about castellans, their duties and responsibilities and regional variations. I'll get on it. LTC (Ret.) David J. Cormier (talk) 20:00, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Great to hear the article's getting some attention! Nev1 (talk) 21:45, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Someone is proposing merging castellany into this article. I support that, since the castellany article is so meagre, and can easily be incorporated. LTC (Ret.) David J. Cormier (talk) 20:00, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The contents of the Castellany page were merged into Castellan. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
The sentence "... they could be a valuable client" makes it sound like inanimate castles collectively might act as a single animate client.
24.143.10.145 (talk) 18:47, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The proposed merging of Castellany with this article took place without signalling it here. Nobody took the trouble to edit the poor un-encyclopaedic English beforehand and then someone made a redirect to the solitary Maltese castellany of Valletta: all rather unsatisfactory. I have tried to clean up, as best I can, but leave it to others to add sources.--Po Mieczu (talk) 22:20, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]