Talk:Battle of Poison Spring
This article is a current featured article candidate. A featured article should exemplify Wikipedia's best work, and is therefore expected to meet the criteria. Please feel free to After one of the FAC coordinators promotes the article or archives the nomination, a bot will update the nomination page and article talk page. Do not manually update the {{Article history}} template when the FAC closes. |
Battle of Poison Spring has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 12, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Poison Spring article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Battle of Poison Spring. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/battle-of-poison-springs-arkansas
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:39, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed[edit]
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://ehistory.osu.edu/books/official-records/061. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:46, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Copyright issue... [Unfounded copyright issue with regard to Battle of Poison Spring page, please restore text][edit]
"Justlettersandnumbers" and "Ealdgyth",
I readily admit that I am a bit bewildered as to how OSU (or anyone else for that matter) could have merely scanned a U.S. government publication and then "copyrighted it" when federal laws and regulations read to the contrary. Copyright laws clearly state that any work created by a federal government employee or officer is in the public domain, provided that the work was created in that person’s official capacity.
In fact, every volume of The War of the Rebellion: a Compilation of the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies that OSU's Department of History has scanned onto their site clearly states in the "[Preface]" that ... "By an act approved June 23,1874, Congress made an appropriation "to enable the Secretary of War to begin the publication of the Official Records of the War of the Rebellion, both of the Union and Confederate Armies ... " And because it is a publication in the public domain, numerous academics and nonprofits have repeatedly scanned these ORs and posted them to their respective websites.
Here are but two such examples:
- The War of the Rebellion: a Compilation of the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies at Cornell University
- The War of the Rebellion: a Compilation of the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies at Internet Archive
Please restore the Battle of Poison Spring text.
Lieutcoluseng (talk) 11:20, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- Lieutcoluseng, as far as I'm aware, no text from the Official Records was removed from the page – I did, however, provide the necessary attribution for some text from the National Parks Service battle summary, which may well be taken from that source. What was removed was a passage from this page, beginning with the sentence "Beyond the Mississippi River the war was not as flashy, but no less bitter" and ending, as I recall, "Just getting the gunboats back was a victory of sorts". As far as I was able to determine, that text is not from the Official Histories (I looked at the version on archive.org), but is an introduction written by OSU, and protected by copyright. If I was wrong about that, please give the exact page and volume number where that text appears in the PD source and I'll ask for the removal to be undone. If on the other hand I was right, you might want to check whether you have at any other time copied text from that website. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:26, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
- Wikipedia featured article candidates
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- GA-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- GA-Class American Civil War articles
- American Civil War task force articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class Arkansas articles
- Low-importance Arkansas articles
- WikiProject Arkansas articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs in Arkansas
- Arkansas articles needing attention
- American Civil War articles needing attention
- United States military history articles needing attention
- United States articles needing attention
- Wikipedia requested photographs in the United States
- WikiProject United States articles