Talk:William D. Leahy

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the William D. Leahy article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

William D. Leahy is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 10, 2022	Good article nominee	Listed
October 4, 2022	WikiProject A-class review	Approved
April 19, 2023	Featured article candidate	Promoted
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 14, 2022. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that William D. Leahy* was the highest-ranking American military officer in World War II?*
Current status: Featured article

Military history: Biography / Maritime / World War I / World War II / Cold War / Operation Majestic Titan

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Maritime warfare task force
	World War I task force
	World War II task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)
	Operation Majestic Titan (Phase IV)

Additional information:
/
	This article has passed an A-Class review.

United States: Iowa / Military history Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Iowa portal This article is supported by WikiProject Iowa (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force.

Biography: Military / Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Puerto Rico Low‑importance

	Puerto Rico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Puerto Rico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to Puerto Rico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Puerto RicoWikipedia:WikiProject Puerto RicoTemplate:WikiProject Puerto RicoPuerto Rico articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merger[edit]

Las memorias de Leahy does not contain part of the diaries but two versions of his memoirs on the Puerto Rican governorship which I found among his papers in Wisconsin a his son William H released to me. I am the editor of that book, Jorge Rodríguez Beruff. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.50.125.84 (talk) 05:07, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've moved over the important information. If someone wants to delete Admiral Leahy article, they're welcome to do so.

Engineer Bob

These historic facts remain relevant to mapping memes shared among future thought leaders of his generation!

After his wife's death, Leahy was a trusted advisor to both U.S. Presidentd F. D. Roosevelt and Harry S. Truman after FDR's death!

geoWIZard-Passports 21:50, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio[edit]

Not sure of the reasoning behind this edit. The website listed in the {{copyvio}} was http://www.williamdleahy.com. This is actually just a redirect to http://web.mac.com/walkerlamond/iWeb/William%20D.%20Leahy/Home.html, which is a users page on mac.com There is no copyright information listed on that sub-site, could it be that WP information was copied TO there, rather than FROM there? After all, isn't that the point of WP? Let's get some discussion before hitting the panic button. — MrDolomite | Talk 08:06, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Not that it is conclusive, but wayback has nothing [1] — MrDolomite | Talk 08:08, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- can someone please tell me what cord he is wearing?????!RAVENCLAW?? (talk) 21:53, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - What do you all mean by what cord?--Biografer (talk) 03:59, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    In case someone else is wondering, this is called an aiguillette. It is worn over the right shoulder by military aides to the President of the United States. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:15, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ambassador to France[edit]

Admiral Leahy was of the utmost importance in Franco-American relations and this section desperately needs expansion. His seduction (figurative) by Petain and Darlan poisoned Franco-American relations for generations. Leahy's views became Roosevelts... and it is mentioned in Churchill's Memoirs of the Second World War. V. Joe (talk) 02:30, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"In his most controvertial role..." Says who?[edit]

There is no citation for the claim in the opening blurb that Leahy's Ambassadorship to France was "his most controversial role." Is this actually cited anywhere in any outstanding literature, or is this just yet more partisan character assassination coming from some hack armchair historian? Citations, please. Thank you 114.167.137.103 (talk) 15:58, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Leahy himself said it: "President Roosevelt sent me on one of the most controversial diplomatic missions of- the entire war period— that of being Ambassador to France." Leahy, I was there page 3 Historians often repeat the theme: "Roosevelt in November 1940 had given Leahy the equally delicate and even more controversial assignment of US ambassador to Vichy France, a post he held for eighteen critical months." (Otis Graham, FDR Encyclopedia); Rjensen (talk) 18:29, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I removed a quote sourced from avn8.com. avn8.com does not provide sources for their quotes and in turn does not promote that their quotes are authentic. Please see the following statement from avn8.com: "These are just for fun. I have no idea whether the quotes are accurate or not. Loosely speaking, they support the idea that appeal to authority is unscientific". I am a bit surprised that anyone would consider avn8.com to be a worthy source as even it's owners seem to feel it is for entertainment purposes only. Monsieur Voltaire (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:36, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why have I never heard of him?[edit]

I was really shocked to see this article. I thought I knew a lot about the war but I've never heard of this guy. Midsummersday (talk) 18:31, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are far from alone in this regard. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:03, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Faulty forecasts retrospective:

https://quotefancy.com/william-d-leahy-quotes

GeoVenturing (talk) 23:11, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Date format[edit]

I am proposing that the date format of this article be changed to the US military (dmy) format per MOS:MILFORMAT. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:59, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The reason that it is currently mdy is that this was the date format that the article was created with and I conformed to the original style (per MOS:DATERET) when I overhauled the article to bring it to featured. However, that puts the article at odds with the usual military dmy style prescribed in the MOS (MOS:MILFORMAT) and similar articles on other admirals like Ernest J. King, which use dmy format. Therefore, I am see king consensus to change the article style. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 01:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DMY. Mztourist (talk) 02:52, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DMY. It is consistent with MOS:MILFORMAT. Ifly6 (talk) 04:28, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DMY. MOS:MILFORMAT is straightforward on this issue. biographical articles related to the modern US military, should use day-before-month. Ckfasdf (talk) 05:46, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DMY, per proposal. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 07:43, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DMY per MOS:MILFORMAT. --Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 13:16, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:38, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"... although the vessel only made it as far as the Azores before breaking down."[edit]

This line, written about a USS Constellation cruise that I presume happened after Leahy became a cadet in 1893, is not mentioned in Constellation's article. That article says:

In September 1892, Constellation recommissioned for another unusual duty, to help assemble works of art in Gibraltar for the World's Columbian Exposition. During the cruise, she made stops in Naples, Italy and Le Havre, France, before returning to New York in February 1893. Another training cruise to Gibraltar followed on 3 June and ended on 29 August. She was then transferred to Annapolis, where she was decommissioned on 2 September before being towed to Norfolk for repairs.

Which one is correct? Could Leahy's biographer have been mistaken (this article), or did DANFS omit mentioning the breakdown (that article)? Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 03:24, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The source says (p. 9):

The cruise was supposed to last all summer, taking the young crewmen to Europe and back to learn their craft. Yet the Constellation was in a sorry state, smelly and leaky, and she broke down before reaching Europe. The crew had to stop in the Azores before the old ship could be made right to sail to America.

It doesn't cite a source unfortunately. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 06:58, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]