Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:FPC)
This star, with one point broken, symbolizes the featured candidates on Wikipedia.
This star, with one point broken, symbolizes the featured candidates on Wikipedia.

Featured pictures are images that add significantly to articles, either by illustrating article content particularly well, or being eye-catching to the point where users will want to read its accompanying article. Taking the adage that "a picture is worth a thousand words", the images featured on Wikipedia:Featured pictures should illustrate a Wikipedia article in such a way as to add significantly to that article, according to the featured picture criteria.

Promoting an image

If you believe an image should be featured, create a subpage (use the "For Nominations" field, below) and add the subpage to the current nominations section.

For promotion, if an image is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers in support and the consensus is in its favor, it can be added to the Wikipedia:Featured pictures list. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-thirds majority in support, including the nominator and/or creator of the image; however, anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets.

All users may comment. However, only those who have been on Wikipedia for 25 days and with at least 100 edits will be included in the numerical count. If necessary, decisions about close candidacies will be made on a case-by-case basis. Nominations started in December are given three extra days, due to the holidays slowing down activity here.

The archive contains all opinions and comments collected for candidate nominations and their nomination results.

If you nominate an image here, please consider also uploading and nominating it at Commons to help ensure that the pictures can be used not just in the English Wikipedia but on all other Wikimedia projects as well.

Delisting an image

A featured picture can be nominated for delisting if you feel it no longer lives up to featured picture standards. You may also request a featured picture be replaced with a superior image. Create a subpage (use the "For Delists" field, below) and add the subpage to the current nominations section.

Please leave a note on the talk page of the original FPC nominator (and creator/uploader, if appropriate) to let them know the delisting is being debated. The user may be able to address the issues and avoid the delisting of the picture.

For delisting, if an image is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers supporting a delist or replace, and the consensus is in its favor, it will be delisted from Wikipedia:Featured pictures. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-thirds majority in support, including the nominator. Note that anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets. However, images are sometimes delisted despite having fewer than five in support of their removal, and there is currently no consensus on how best to handle delist closures, except that:If the image to be delisted is not used in any articles by the time of closure, it must be delisted. If it is added to articles during the nomination, at least one week's stability is required for the nomination to be closed as "Kept". The nomination may be suspended if a week hasn't yet passed to give the rescue a chance.

Outside of the nominator, all voters are expected to have been on Wikipedia for 25 days and to have made a minimum of 100 edits. If necessary, decisions about close candidacies will be made on a case-by-case basis. As with regular nominations, delist nominations are given three extra days to run if started in December.

  • Note that delisting an image does not mean deleting it. Delisting from Featured pictures in no way affects the image's status in its article(s).
Shortcuts

Featured content:

Featured picture tools:

Step 1:
Evaluate

Evaluate the merit of a nomination against the featured picture criteria. Most users reference terms from this page when evaluating nominations.
Step 2:
Create a subpage
For Nominations

To create a subpage of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates for your nomination, add a title for the image you want to nominate in the field below (e.g., Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Labrador Retriever) and click the "Create new nomination" button.


For Delists (or Delist & Replace)

To create a subpage for your delist, add a title for the image you want to delist/replace in the field below and click the "Create new delist nomination" button.


Step 3:
Transclude and link

Transclude the newly created subpage to the Featured picture candidate list (direct link).

How to comment for Candidate Images

  • Write Support, if you approve of the picture. A reason is optional.
  • Write Oppose, followed by your reasoning, if you disapprove of the picture. All objections should be accompanied by a specific rationale that, if addressed, would make you support the image. If your concern is one that can only be addressed by the creator, and if they haven't nominated or commented on the image, and if they are a Wikipedian, you should notify them directly.
  • You can weak support or weak oppose instead, so that your opinion will be weighed as half of a "full" opinion.
    • To change your opinion, strike it out (with <s>...</s>) rather than removing it.
  • If you think a nominated image obviously fails the featured picture criteria, write Speedy close followed by your reasons. Nominations may be closed early if this is the case.
Recommendations added early in the process may be disregarded if they do not address concerns and/or improvements that arise later in the debate. Reviewers are advised to monitor the progress of a nomination and update their votes accordingly.
Prior to giving an opinion, the image should be assessed on its quality as displayed at full size (high-resolution) in an image editing program. Please note that the images are only displayed at thumbnail size on this page. The thumbnail links to the image description page which, in turn, links to the high-resolution version.

How to comment for Delist Images

  • Write Keep, followed by your reasons for keeping the picture.
  • Write Delist, followed by your reasons for delisting the picture.
  • Write Delist and Replace if you believe the image should be replaced by a better picture.
  • You can weak keep, weak delist or weak delist and replace instead, so that your opinion will be weighed as half of a "full" opinion.
    • To change your opinion, strike it out (with <s>...</s>) rather than removing it.
Please remember to be civil, not to bite the newbies and to comment on the image, not the person.

You may find the glossary useful when you encounter acronyms or jargon in other voters' comments. You can also link to it by using {{FPCgloss}}.

Editing candidates

If you feel you could improve a candidate by image editing, please feel free to do so, but do not overwrite or remove the original. Instead, upload your edit with a different file name (e.g., add "edit" to the file name), and display it below the original nomination. Edits should be appropriately captioned in sequential order (e.g., Edit 1, Edit 2, etc), and describe the modifications that have been applied.

Is my monitor adjusted correctly?

In a discussion about the brightness of an image, it is necessary to know if the computer display is properly adjusted. Displays differ greatly in their ability to show shadow detail. There are four dark grey circles in the adjacent image. If you can discern three (or even four) of the circles, your monitor can display shadow detail correctly. If you see fewer than three circles, you may need to adjust the monitor and/or computer display settings. Some displays cannot be adjusted for ideal shadow detail. Please take this into account when voting.

Displays also differ greatly in their ability to show highlight detail. There are light grey circles in the adjacent image. If you can discern three (or even four) of the circles, your monitor can display highlight detail correctly. If you see fewer than three circles, you may need to adjust the monitor and/or computer display settings (probably reduce the contrast setting). Some displays cannot be adjusted for ideal highlight detail. Please take this into account when voting.

On a gamma-adjusted display, the four circles in the color image blend into the background when seen from a few feet (roughly 75–150 cm) away. If they do not, you could adjust the gamma setting (found in the computer's settings, not on the display), until they do. This may be very difficult to attain, and a slight error is not detrimental. Uncorrected PC displays usually show the circles darker than the background. Note that the image must be viewed in original size (263 × 68 pixels) - if enlarged or reduced, results are not accurate.

Note that on most consumer LCD displays (laptop or flat screen), viewing angle strongly affects these images. Correct adjustment on one part of the screen might be incorrect on another part for a stationary head position. Click on the images for more technical information. If possible, calibration with a hardware monitor calibrator is recommended.
To see recent changes, purge the page cache.
FPCs needing feedback


Edward Weston, Armco Steel, Ohio

Current nominations[edit]

Vela Supernova Remnant[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2024 at 02:41:01 (UTC)

Original – The Vela supernova remnant imaged by the VLT Survey Telescope
Reason
Quality lead image in Vela Supernova Remnant article. The image is large so if your browser can't open it, consider opening it at 2048 x 2048 pixels at This link, or download and view it in a photo viewing/editing software. The image is FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears
Vela Supernova Remnant
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Looking out
Creator
ESO/TIMER survey

African blue flycatcher[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2024 at 10:31:43 (UTC)

Original – African blue flycatcher at Kibale National Park
Reason
Unanimously featured on Commons two week ago. Headline image.
Articles in which this image appears
African blue flycatcher
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator
Giles Laurent

Tyniec abbey[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2024 at 10:27:52 (UTC)

Original – View of the Vistula River, Tyniec Abbey (on the right), and Camaldolese Monastery (on the left) on the western outskirts of Krakow.
Reason
Featured unanimously on Commons last year. Headline image on two articles.
Articles in which this image appears
Tyniec, Action of Tyniec Abbey, Kraków
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator
Jakub Hałun
  • Support as nominator – MER-C 10:27, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – The abbey is barely 1/3rd of the image. I'd prefer a tighter crop, with less vegetations, which can boost EV too. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:36, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – Agree. Too much leafy foreground. Narrower framing would improve accessibility. Leaning toward oppose. – Sca (talk) 12:39, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

William Howard Taft[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2024 at 23:37:53 (UTC)

Original – William Howard Taft
Reason
Quite a nice image, a nightmare to restore; It's not absolutely perfect, but after a month on it, methinks I've gotten anything obvious, so...
Articles in which this image appears
William Howard Taft (One that includes the cabinet card is in Pach Brothers.
FP category for this image
WP:Featured pictures/People/Political
Creator
Pach Brothers, restored by Adam Cuerden

Here kitty kitty[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2024 at 09:05:44 (UTC)

Original – Domestic cat, a ten month old female.
Reason
High quality FP worthy picture with high EV, and a FP in various Wikis and Commons.
Articles in which this image appears
Cat and Carnivora
FP category for this image
Mammals
Creator
Von.grzanka on Commons
One of the lead images in a GA infobox is not encyclopedic enought? We have promoted images with even lesser exposure. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:02, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – Per Charles. Cute kitty, but nothing special. Przepraszam. – Sca (talk) 12:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, per Charles. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 09:35, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – I am puzzled by Charles' "No EV" oppose rationale. Can Charles or others elaborate as to what characteristic(s) must a photo have to pass the EV criterion #5 in regard to the Cat article? Also, can you point to a photo in the domestic cat category (or elsewhere on the web) that meets the EV criterion (not on the technical or compositional basis, but just on the EV basis)? Thanks. Pinging @Charlesjsharp: since he does not participate here on a regular basis. Bammesk (talk) 16:08, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fails on criterion #5. Does not add significant encyclopedic value to the article and does not help readers to understand the article. Unless you have never seen a cat before. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Charlesjsharp, correct me if I am wrong, you are saying "cat" is a common subject, therefore no image of a cat can "add significant encyclopedic value to the (cat) article and help readers to understand the (cat) article"? Bammesk (talk) 17:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've been pondering over the same question raised by Bammesk for the past 2 days. I don't understand the EV rationale by the oppose votes either. It says in the criterion that the image should add significant encyclopedic value to an article and helps readers to understand an article which this image fulfills clearly. The criterion also says picture's encyclopedic value (referred to as "EV") is given priority over its artistic value. The current candidate is used as an example of the member of species Cat in it's infobox. How can you add any more of encyclopedic value to a picture? When you imagine a cat, this is how it looks like. When you google a cat, this is what it shows. When you see an animal that looks like this, you can understand this is a cat. This is clear cut EV right there. I'd like to ping @Sca and Hamid Hassani: also to the discussion for their take on encyclopedic value of a cat image. Any take would be much appreciated and will help me chose a better image next time (Since per FPC guidelines, All objections should be accompanied by a specific rationale that, if addressed, would make you support the image.) Also, you may suggest any alternate image too. Additionally, I'd like to ask Charles how this candidate is any different than your black kite nomination that seemingly is in the similar context. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 20:01, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All black kites, as wild animals, look much the same. A high quality image can represent the species, either perched or flying, male or female (if you can tell the difference). Domesticated animals all look different and one image cannot represent them. Quite apart from that, this is a very ordinary image and there are hundreds of excellent cat images to choose from. Finally, we already have an FP. It is not as silly as the attempt to nominate a picture to represent 'MAN'. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:09, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's a cat. Period. -- Sca (talk) 00:33, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • True, but this is a ubiquitous wild animal, not one of 600 million cats. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:11, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Good, cute picture; but the cat is hunched over, and its body is not completely visible, esp. from the side. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:28, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Hooded Man[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2024 at 12:02:05 (UTC)

Original – A prisoner (Abdou Hussain Saad Faleh) at Abu Ghraib stands on a thin box, his head hooded and his fingers extended out and connected to wires.
ALT
Reason
While it does not fulfill the first criterion, it is undeniably a historical photo. This specific image is probably the most published version, and even appeared on the cover of The Economist. An alternate photo does exist, however this is the less widely distributed version and appears on no English wikipedia articles.
Articles in which this image appears
Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse, Abu Ghraib prison, Charles Graner, Seymour Hersh, Torture, Hooding, Criticism of the war on terror, Outline of the Iraq War, United States war crimes, List of photographs considered the most important
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/War
Creator
Ivan Frederick
  • Support as nominator – ―Howard • 🌽33 12:02, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - "appears on no English wikipedia articles" makes it ineligible. --Janke | Talk 16:11, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Absolutely we should not promote the worse copy. Replace the image and then nominate. Though, really, we want a bigger copy if one exists. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 17:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Added a cropped version of the alternate. This one does not, however, meet the size requirement.
Waaay too tightly cropped. If it's cropped at all, it should be the same way as the original Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 16:26, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vainakh tower architecture[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2024 at 03:00:59 (UTC)

Original – An example of Vainakh tower architecture. This complex is a medieval military fortification in the Erzi Nature Reserve region of Ingushetia in Northern Caucasus.
Reason
Seems like a good example of Vainakh tower architecture, dating back to first century and medieval times in Chechnya and Ingushetia regions of Northern Caucasus. This photo is a military fortification in the medieval village of Erzi. According to the file description, these towers are around 95 feet (29 meters) high. I saw this on Commons FPC recently.
Articles in which this image appears
Erzi (village), Vainakh tower architecture, Ingush towers, Nakh peoples, +2
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator
Vyacheslav Argenberg
  • Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 03:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Moonreach (talk) 16:37, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I had a look at this, and saw this image can be used in many other articles. MER-C 19:02, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feature picture nomination for File:2024 Total Solar Eclipse (NHQ202404080201).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2024 at 20:19:00 (UTC)

Original – Image of the April 8 2024 solar eclipse, the top half of the Washington Monument is at the bottom.
Reason
The framing of the image, is of high resolution, and the Washington Monument at the bottom half of the frame serves almost as a leading line pointing up to the eclipse. The foggy background adds to the dramatic effect.
Articles in which this image appears
Solar eclipse of April 8, 2024
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena/Others
Creator
NASA/Bill Ingalls
Seems that's the top of the monument, rather than the top half. -- Sca (talk) 02:00, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Procedural oppose – Opposing all 2024 eclipse pictures for 10 days due to stability issues. Try renominating after a month or so, so that the image is stable in the articles The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Agreed. This is a great photo (well-composed, everything in focus, good color and gamut), it's just too soon. Moonreach (talk) 15:00, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Aye. Little too soon. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 23:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Procedural oppose– As per above. X (talk) 19:09, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clementine[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2024 at 12:06:58 (UTC)

Original – Clementines - peeled and unpeeled. (It is the same clementine.)
Reason
Unanimously featured on Commons. Clear EV.
Articles in which this image appears
Clementine
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Fruits
Creator
Rhododendrites
  • Support as nominator – MER-C 12:06, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – I doubt the EV, primarily because the lead image already is a very descriptive one and two, the image is pretty down in the article. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 12:26, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - An excellent, simple photograph that illustrates the subject perfectly. While it's true this is the fourth photo down on the page, it's not an enormous article where the photo gets lost. Moonreach (talk) 14:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Are these clementines from the Death Star cafeteria? What's with the black mirror background? It would be nicer if they were on a plate or wooden cutting board or something where they didn't look so out of place. Nosferattus (talk) 03:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Mainly responding to say "death star cafeteria" made me laugh. I feel like the reason people (like me in this case) use surfaces like this are to try to make an ordinary, everyday subject into something dramatic. It's like, if I'm going to take the time to set up a whole photo shoot for a piece of fruit, focus stack a whole lot of shots of that fruit, meticulously peel it, and do the whole thing over again then I might as well be consistent with treating it like a celebrity. That's a "why the photographer did this" explanation, though, and not a "what someone thinks would be most natural in an article" explanation. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 19:38, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Stupid question, maybe, but is only the highlighted area on the front of the left one in focus, or is that an illusion? Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 15:53, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    It should all be in focus (it's two focus-stacked pictures composited next to each other). It got by the pixel peeping on Commons, anyway. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 19:38, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support then. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 03:30, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – Giles Laurent (talk) 10:56, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – Bammesk (talk) 01:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Iberian lynx[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2024 at 11:45:21 (UTC)

Original – Iberian Lynx (Lynx pardinus), Almuradiel, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Reason
Featured on Commons two months ago. Headline image. Endangered.
Articles in which this image appears
Iberian lynx
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Creator
Diego Delso

Joh Bjelke-Petersen[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2024 at 01:41:50 (UTC)

Original – Sir Joh Bjelke-Petersen, c. 1980
Reason
Good quality. High resolution
Articles in which this image appears
Joh Bjelke-Petersen etc.
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political
Creator
Premier's Department, State Public Relations Bureau, Photographic Unit (Queensland Government)

Amália Rodrigues[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2024 at 01:41:48 (UTC)

Original – Rodrigues in 1969
Alt – proposed crop


Reason
High quality and resolution
Articles in which this image appears
Amália Rodrigues
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator
Anefo
  • Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 01:41, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support either – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 11:08, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – Dark. – Sca (talk) 12:34, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – I added Alt, with the top and right side trimmed. It's a temporary CSS image crop. If it passes, we will upload a real crop. Bammesk (talk) 02:22, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Weston, Armco Steel, Ohio[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2024 at 16:38:37 (UTC)

Original – Edward Weston, Armco Steel, Ohio, 1922
Sepia
Reason
good quality copy of an iconic picture
Articles in which this image appears
Edward Weston, List of photographs considered the most important, AK Steel
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Engineering and technology/Machinery
Creator
Edward Weston, restored and uploaded by Yann
  • Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 16:38, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – Question whether being a Weston photo makes this one interesting or informative. It's one of over a dozen pix in the Weston article. EV? – Sca (talk) 13:00, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. I added a bit more about it to the Weston article, though there was already a fair amount there. Weston isn't really known for industrial photographs but this is probably his most important picture in that genre. blameless 02:02, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • I've also added it to AK Steel, replacing two very poor photographs. blameless 02:10, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – The original is a print [1] at MoMA. I am not sure about removing its tone. Otherwise it would be a support for me. Bammesk (talk) 02:14, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • This was printed from a black & white negative. We don't even know if the print was in sepia. In the 19th century, prints were done in sepia, but in 1922? I also proposing a sepia version. Yann (talk) 10:10, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    1922? Very common. That said, why is the MOMA one subtle sepia and this one all-in on sepia? Adobe RGB to sRGB conversion error?Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 13:50, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think the original print's tone is a flaw, or damage needing modification (FP criterion #8). Bammesk (talk) 15:51, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Signing of Paris Peace Accords[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2024 at 13:36:49 (UTC)

Original – US Secretary of State William Rogers Signing the Paris Peace Accords, 27 January 1973, at Hotel Majestic, Paris
Alt1 – Actually the original
Alt2 – New version from scratch
Reason
Signing of an international peace accord, high EV, good quality
Articles in which this image appears
Paris Peace Accords, The Peninsula Paris, Vietnam stab-in-the-back myth
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/War
Creator
Robert LeRoy Knudsen, uploaded and cleaned by Hohum
  • Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 13:36, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I feel like it's been taken a little too blue while trying to fix yhe yellowing Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 14:52, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I corrected that. I added the original as alternative. It was in Adobe, and I moved it RGB color profile, which may explain the color issue. Yann (talk) 17:22, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The caption isn't correct: the Vietnam War ended several years later. Nick-D (talk) 01:35, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, two years later, but that was the objective of this diplomatic agreement. I edited the description to be more precise. Yann (talk) 11:16, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Alt 2 – Bammesk (talk) 15:09, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - visible grain and posterisation at file description page size, perhaps even in the thumbnail here. The TIFF has much less grain. MER-C 19:00, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I changed my vote to Alt 2. Bammesk (talk) 01:15, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Alt 2 is certainly better, enough to withdraw my oppose. MER-C 18:27, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations — to be closed[edit]

Nominations in this category are older than ten days and are to be closed. New votes will no longer be accepted.

Older nominations requiring additional input from users[edit]

These nominations have been moved here because consensus is impossible to determine without additional input from those who participated in the discussion. Usually this is because there was more than one edit of the image available, and no clear preference for one of them was determined. If you voted on these images previously, please update your vote to specify which edit(s) you are supporting.

Closing procedure[edit]

A script is available that automates the majority of these tasks: User:Jujutacular/closeFPC

When NOT promoted, perform the following:

  1. Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/subpage:
    {{FPCresult|Not promoted| }} --~~~~
    • Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
  2. If the nominator is new to FPC, consider placing {{subst:NotpromotedFPC|Image name}} on their talk page. To avoid overuse, do not use the template when in doubt.

When promoted, perform the following:

  1. Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/subpage:
    {{FPCresult|Promoted|File:FILENAME.JPG}} --~~~~
    • Replace FILENAME.JPG with the name of the file that was promoted. It should show up as:
    Promoted File:FILENAME.JPG
    • Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
  2. Add the image to:
  3. Add the image to the proper sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures - newest on top.
    The caption for a Wikipedian created image should read "Description at Article, by Creator". For a non-Wikipedian, it should be similar, but if the creator does not have an article, use an external link if appropriate. For images with substantial editing by one or more Wikipedians, but created by someone else, use "Description at Article, by Creator (edited by Editor)" (all editors involved should be clear from the nomination). Additionally, the description is optional - if it's essentially the same as the article title, then just use "Article, by Creator". Numerous examples can be found on the various Featured Pictures subpages.
  4. Add the image to the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures - newest on left and remove the oldest from the right so that there are always three in each section.
  5. Add the Featured Picture tag and star to the image page using {{Featured picture|page_name}} (replace page_name with the nomination page name, i.e., the page_name from Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/page_name). To add this template you most likely will have to click the "create" button on the upper right if the "edit" button is not present, generally if the image originates from Commons.
  6. If an edited or alternative version of the originally nominated image is promoted, make sure that all articles contain the Featured Picture version, as opposed to the original.
  7. Notify the nominator or co-nominators by placing {{subst:PromotedFPC|File:file_name.xxx}} on each nominator's talk page. For example: {{subst:PromotedFPC|File:Blue morpho butterfly.jpg}}.
  8. If the image was created by a Wikipedian, place {{subst:UploadedFP|File:file_name.xxx}} on the creator's talk page. For example: {{subst:UploadedFP|File:Blue morpho butterfly.jpg}}.

Then perform the following, regardless of the outcome:

  1. Move the nomination entry to the top of the "Recently closed nominations" section. It will remain there for three days after closing so others can review the nomination. This is done by simply moving the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Page name}} to the top of the section.
  2. Add the nomination entry to the bottom of the April archive. This is done by simply adding the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Page name}} from this page to the bottom of the archive.
  3. If the nomination is listed at Template:FPC urgents, remove it.

Delist closing procedure[edit]

Note that delisting an image does not equal deleting it. Delisting from Featured pictures in no way affects the image's status in its article/s.

If consensus is to KEEP featured picture status, and the image is used in at least one article, perform the following:

  1. Check that the image has been in the article for at least one week. Otherwise, suspend the nomination to give it time to stabilize before continuing.
  2. Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
    {{FPCresult|Kept|}} --~~~~
    • Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
  3. Optionally leave a note on the picture's talk page.

If consensus is to DELIST, or the image is unused (and consensus is not for a replacement that is used), perform the following:

  1. Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
    {{FPCresult|Delisted|}} --~~~~
    • Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
  2. Replace the {{Featured picture}} tag from the image with {{FormerFeaturedPicture|delist/''Image name''}}.
  3. Remove the image from the appropriate sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures and the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs.

If consensus is to REPLACE (and at least one of the images is used in articles), perform the following:

  1. Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
    {{FPCresult|Replaced|}} with File:NEW_IMAGE_FILENAME.JPG --~~~~
    • Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
    • Replace NEW_IMAGE_FILENAME.JPG with the name of the replacement file.
  2. Replace the {{Featured picture}} tag from the delisted image with {{FormerFeaturedPicture|delist/''Image name''}}.
  3. Update the replacement picture's tag, adding the tag {{Featured picture|delist/image_name}} (replace image_name with the nomination page name, i.e., the image_name from Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/delist/image_name). Remove any no longer applicable tags from the original, replacement and from any other alternatives. If the alternatives were on Commons and no longer have any tags, be sure to tag the description page with {{missing image}}.
  4. Replace the delisted Featured Picture in all articles with the new replacement Featured Picture version. Do NOT replace the original in non-article space, such as Talk Pages, FPC nominations, archives, etc.
  5. Ensure that the replacement image is included on the appropriate sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures and the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs. Do this by replacing the original image with the new replacement image; do not add the replacement as a new Featured Picture.

Then perform the following, regardless of the outcome:

  1. Move the nomination entry to the top of the "Recently closed nominations" section. It will remain there for three days after closing so others can review the nomination. This is done by simply moving the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image name}} to the top of the section.
  2. Add the nomination entry to the bottom of the archived delist nominations. This is done by simply adding the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image name}} to the bottom of the appropriate section of the archive.
  3. If the nomination is listed at Template:FPC urgents, remove it.

Recently closed nominations[edit]

Nominations in this category have already been closed and are here for the purposes of closure review by FPC contributors. Please do not add any further comments or votes regarding the original nomination. If you wish to discuss any of these closures, please do so at Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates. Nominations will stay here for three full days following closure and subsequently be removed.

Fishermen at work[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2024 at 07:43:12 (UTC)

Original – Fishermen at work from Muzhappilangad Drive-in Beach in Kerala
Reason
It has good composition
Articles in which this image appears
Muzhappilangad Beach
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes
Creator
Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:43, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 08:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Delist and Replace: Shakespeare[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2024 at 08:27:40 (UTC)

The current FP
Proposed replacement
Edited version
Reason
The current FP was promoted about 16 years ago, and still is a good one. But there is a better file with sharper and higher res scan of the original, that is already used in the main subject article as lead image, as well as multiple other important articles. The proposed replacement is also the one closer to the original colors of the painting.
Articles this image appears in
about 70 articles
Articles the proposed replacement appears
Act (drama), Life of William Shakespeare, Outline of William Shakespeare, Shakespeare bibliography and William Shakespeare
Previous nomination/s
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/William Shakespeare
Nominator
The Herald (Benison) (talk)
  • Delist and/or replace any version — Once D&R done, I'll update the articles with the new FP. I have dropped a message on the original nominator, but they aren't active in three years.The Herald (Benison) (talk) 08:27, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Replace. Source is the gallery hosting the painting itself. Colours are probably better although I'm not sure what happened in the top left corner. MER-C 18:09, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Prefer edit. MER-C 10:53, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Based on the current FP, the proposal could get some cleaning. Yann (talk) 21:34, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not exactly my area of expertise, but summoning Adam Cuerden for a review, please. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:08, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For whatever reason, paintings are usually considered off-limits, even when the lighting is going to emphasise or de-emphasize the cracks and dust. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 12:30, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. And BTW, the Beethoven pic was a case in point, IMO. -- Sca (talk) 14:00, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't mean the cracks, which are on the painting, but the white dots, which aren't. Yann (talk) 13:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I made a new version, cleaning some white spots. Yann (talk) 18:23, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced with File:William Shakespeare by John Taylor, edited.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 11:11, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • PS: I plan to replace the images in articles after the cache catches up (image was used in 2 stub templates). Armbrust The Homunculus 11:32, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Mexican vine snake[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2024 at 05:18:56 (UTC)

Original – Mexican vine snake in El Palmar ecological reserve (Yucatán, Mexico).
Reason
FP on Commons; used in the article's infobox
Articles in which this image appears
Oxybelis aeneus
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles
Creator
The Cosmonaut
Lmao, man. Good one. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 13:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Mexican vine snake.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 11:08, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suspended nominations[edit]

This section is for Featured Picture (or delisting) candidacies whose closure is postponed for additional editing, rendering, or copyright clarification.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates&oldid=1219195703"