Talk:Scandal!

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 28 May 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Scandal! (TV series) to Scandal!. The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 28 May 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} (please mention me on reply) 04:44, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Scandal! (TV series) → Scandal! – WP:SMALLDETAILS. No disambiguation needed, but a hatnote must be sufficient. RMXY (talk) 12:29, 28 May 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} (please mention me on reply) 18:43, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose and move to Scandal! (South African TV series) per WP:SMALLDETAILS and Scandal (TV series). We only do this for mega-notable exceptions such as Airplane! In ictu oculi (talk) 06:52, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Agree here. RMXY (talk) 12:26, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@RapMonstaXY: Are you saying you oppose your own RM? 162 etc. (talk) 14:19, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per nom. "We only do this for mega-notable exceptions" is not a statement backed up by policy or proof. It is a broad, wide-ranging policy on all Wikipedia articles that has been backed up by consensus. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:58, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's my observation https://www.thesouthafrican.com/culture/soapies/whats-new-on-scandal/ based on lack of consistency in sources for borderline notable ! articles In ictu oculi (talk) 17:21, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Now, that what I call, an "agree" here. Now will go with this. RMXY (talk) 23:41, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support as it appears to be the only with the exclamation mark but Scandal (TV series) should probably be moved as the absence doesn't distinguish. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:35, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose and move to Scandal! (South African TV series). Clarity is always best. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:29, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support WP:SMALLDETAILS is a policy, and there's no statement that it only applies to "mega-notable exceptions". The WP:CRITERIA are the question here, and I think just Scandal! is best per both SMALLDETAILS meaning Precision isn't going to raise issues here, and per Concision which supports removal of unneeded disambiguators. A hatnote should be sufficient here. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 01:12, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.