This file is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles
This file is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
This file is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
This file does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
To the uploader Please note that while Wikipedia content is licenced under the GFDL, your web browser and operating system are most likely not. Please crop the screenshot so that no GUI elements are visible, only the actual Wikipedia content.
The POINT of the screenshot is to show IE 1, it happening on displaying wikipedia happens to be a bonus, removing the GUI elements means there is NO POINT of the screenshot. 220.233.48.200 11:02, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This has gone to far →AzaToth 02:42, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Showing IE1 displaying a modern Wikipedia page, a website using markup that didn't exist when IE1 was used, seems a little silly. In the screenshot you can see rendering errors and formatting that contemporary users would not have witnessed. Maybe you could pull up an old microsoft.com or google.com webpage from archive.org? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.168.240.243 (talk) 04:26, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Probably to do with lack of virtual host support (i.e.: IE1 requesting / and not sending HOST header). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:470:1F09:EB0:EA39:35FF:FE5A:F8D0 (talk) 10:59, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
