Sounds icky, but I have every confidence that the 9th Circus will do
the right thing here.
If it did stand, all the way to the Supreme Court, it could very
negatively affect everything that we're doing. It would make the
Wikipedia non-profit vulnerable to a lawsuit based on the actions of a
user, which would mean -- in practice -- that we'd have to police
things a lot more centrally, etc. It'd be crushing to our whole
development model.
But, I'm not too worried. This sounds like it'll be a slam-dunk
on appeal.