On Thu, 2003-05-22 at 21:22, Daniel Ehrenberg wrote:
--- The Cunctator <cunctator(a)kband.com> wrote:
Yes, it would. Gotta love that passive voice:
"the
[[communist state]]
article was intended..." By whom, I wonder.
Moreover, if you read the content of the [[communist
state]] entry, it's
evident that it's not just about theory.
I'm just repeating what was said previously on this list.
The question which, like Chthulu, rises forbiddingly from the depths,
is: why did you do so?
And I'm not trying to be pusillanimous. I'm just trying to point out
that avoiding the passive voice is healthy practice.