[WikiEN-l] Re: DW is still here - time for an IP ban

Fri Jan 31 15:49:55 UTC 2003

M Carling wrote:

>If this turns out a be a serious problem, one idea would be to only allow
>logged-in users to make changes (except in the Sandbox).

That won't do much to keep out banned people. If someone wants to 
continually evade the ban, all they would have to do is subscribe a 
different user name every time they need to log in.

Banning IP numbers isn't a very satisfactory solution either. To get 
around that barrier, just visit a different Internet cafe every day.

In the event that this becomes more of a problem, perhaps the tech 
folks should start working on a more substantial system for 
authenticating subscribers. Here's what I think would work:

(1) Establish a toggle that people with developer status can use to 
switch between "permission required" and "no permission required" 
mode for accepting new subscriptions. When "permission required" is 
turned ON, new subscribers would have to pass their submission 
request through a sysop, who would have to approve it before they can 
begin posting. When it is turned OFF, people can subscribe the same 
way they do now. Most of the time, it would be turned OFF, but in 
situations where a persistent vandal is active, it could be turned 
ON. That would make it possible to deny access to the vandal until he 
or she loses interest and goes elsewhere.

(2) Create a special page, computer-generated and available only to 
sysops, which lists all of the pending submission requests. It will 
list the nickname of each pending subscriber alongside a check box, 
so a sysop can go through and quickly approve a batch of names simply 
by running down the list, checking the boxes, and clicking a "submit" 
button. A separate check box next to each user name can be used to 
flag individuals for further scrutiny, and clicking on the name 
itself will take you to a talk page for that user. Most users can be 
quickly approved this way simply by verifying that their IP number is 
not on a banned list or range. The others can be contacted via email 
and asked a few questions. Of course, vandals could still get through 
eventually by giving disingenuous answers, but there would be enough 
barriers to entry to slow them down and keep them from simply running 
amok at will.
-- 
--------------------------------
|  Sheldon Rampton
|  Editor, PR Watch (www.prwatch.org)
|  Author of books including:
|     Friends In Deed: The Story of US-Nicaragua Sister Cities
|     Toxic Sludge Is Good For You
|     Mad Cow USA
|     Trust Us, We're Experts
--------------------------------