On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 11:36:00PM +0100, Erik Moeller wrote:
The current
policy is the healthier one. Wikipedia should by and large
reflect the common consensus, at least on a zero-order approximation, not
try to enforce the "correct" view
There's no reason to put correct in quotation marks here if nobody
disagrees other than by mere habit. And if that is so, it is proper for an
encyclopedia to use the correct term. That's why the Britannica uses
"Ockham's Razor". Using the Google popularity test for article titles is
unprofessional.
Look, English isn't your native language; I wish you would stop showing
disrespect for the common linguistic heritage of those for who it IS
their first, and usually ONLY language.
Jonathan
--
Geek House Productions, Ltd.
Providing Unix & Internet Contracting and Consulting,
QA Testing, Technical Documentation, Systems Design & Implementation,
General Programming, E-commerce, Web & Mail Services since 1998
Phone: 604-435-1205
Email: djw(a)reactor-core.org
Webpage:
http://reactor-core.org
Address: 2459 E 41st Ave, Vancouver, BC V5R2W2