Re: [WikiEN-l] Larry's text is being unfairly criticised

--- Robert <rkscience100(a)yahoo.com> wrote: I have confessed being misinformed on the subject of philosophy (and other various cognitive subjects), and I apologize about the hostile attitude I have shown towards larry's text and this mailing-list's participants in general. Nevertheless, the discussion has diverged to other topics not necessarily related to larry or his writing. For example, I have recently added a new addition to the "What Wikipedia is Not" article, from what was criticism of the very suitability of these types of texts to wikipedia, the guideline/rule in its current form goes like this: What Wikipedia is not . . 19. An educational textbook. Though Wikipedia attempts to explain many non-trivial scientific and philosophical topics, articles should not be written merely with the intention of teaching the subject, this is what book references are for. I plan to add more refinements to the policies and rules in the next weeks. -- Rotem __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop! http://platinum.yahoo.com