[WikiEN-l] 172--what happened

Tue Apr 1 16:50:00 UTC 2003

> Danny did nothing wrong. I intend to follow his example.

> If I see people fighting over an article, I'm going to protect it and tell
> them to chill out.

> AND I reserve the right to choose which "old version" to revert to.

Obviously, you have to do this.

> AND FURTHERMORE, if I can figure out a neutral way to fix the article, I see
> no ethical reason not to:
> * make ONE edit

No, this violates the sysop/editor distinction. Please don't do that. By  
making an edit and subsequently protecting it, you are giving it a raised  
status. This is entirely unacceptable.

Regards,

Erik