Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image:I-80 Eastshore Fwy.jpg

I-80 Eastshore Fwy[edit]

Reason: What appears to be excessive noise reduction has left this image smeary. Poor contrast. Such an easily re-takable image should be have much higher IQ
Nominator: Mfield (talk)

Delist — Mfield (talk) 12:11, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It shows the road and cars great.--CPacker (talk) 20:04, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delist. Easily replaceable. Heck, I've got a B/W print of the 405 in LA that works just as well as this. howcheng {chat} 01:00, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep BigHairRef | Talk 00:52, 6 March 2008 (UTC) I honestly can't see the issues withthis photograph, it's not like you need to be able to see which finger each driver's got up his nose. The picture's plenty sharp enough for me and I'm displaying it on WuXGA monitor, especially when it's going to be no more than a couple of inches across on most screens anyway, it won't be anywhere near noticable)[reply]
Delist This was nominated 3 years ago, standards have changed since then. This could easily be retaken with better lighting. --ErgoSum88 (talk) 14:12, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per above. crassic\^talk 18:48, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
weak keep Not a horrible shot, and I'd feel better about delisting if we had a replacement at the ready. I use the "a better shot could be taken" line when critiquing a fresh candidate, but it seems out of place somehow to use it on a delist - go ahead and delist when the better shot gets taken, y'know? Matt Deres (talk) 22:07, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delist. Agree that it likely wouldn't pass now, mainly for lack of 'wow'. Quality is acceptable (at the low end of). Could definitely be improved on. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 18:13, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted MER-C 08:57, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]