Talk:You Can Count on Me

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:You Can Count On Me)

Requested move 30 December 2015[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as proposed. Primary topic questions can be addressed with a new RM if required. Jenks24 (talk) 12:32, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


– Correct me if I'm wrong, but if I understand MOS:CT correctly, this title falls into the "Words that have the same form as prepositions, but are not being used specifically as prepositions" as "count on" is a phrasal verb. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 04:16, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Move to You Can Count on Me (film) - there is no primary topic here ; and "on" is a preposition in the sentence, same as lean on the wall, rely on me, count on me. In ictu oculi (talk) 13:52, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • count on is a phrasal verb, as well as all the examples you gave.[1][2] Also, nothing at You Can Count on Me (disambiguation) indicates a similar primary topic to assert "there is no primary topic here", just a song notable for being performed at Eurovision, and a song notable for its B-side which a music blog ranked as one of the "Best Songs of 2010". This film, on the other hand, received multiple awards, and was nominated to 2 Oscars[3], so if you don't think it is primary, you need evidence. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 19:58, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. See Take On Me and Cum On Feel the Noize as other examples. Unreal7 (talk) 01:57, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support capitalization of "Count On", per MOS:CT, due to its apparent usage here as a phrasal verb. I don't currently have a strong opinion about the PRIMARYTOPIC question posed by IIO (which is a separate matter from what was raised by the nominator here), but I'm leaning toward Tbhotch's view on that due to the Oscar nominations, etc. —BarrelProof (talk) 20:17, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on You Can Count On Me. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:42, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 24 March 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Near unanimous consensus on the grammar, other titles may be moved following subsequent discussions. (non-admin closure) SportingFlyer T·C 00:06, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You Can Count On Me → You Can Count on Me – film itself uses a lowercase "on" in the title card Goldenimam (talk) 02:37, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:35, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:You_Can_Count_on_Me&oldid=1206118554"