Talk:The Sound Pattern of English

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Linguistics: Phonetics

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Phonetics Task Force.

[Untitled][edit]

I moved these draft notes here from the article; looks like an outline of some proposed additions:

...the transformational cycle

...what kind of phonomena get explained: where stresses fall in an utterance, vocalic shift

...influence on modern phonology

sɪzlæk [ +t, +c ] 07:36, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)

Ha, I love how the picture is of an old and wrinkled copy of SPE...seems fitting, somehow. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.89.158.132 (talk) 17:20, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What's this about Lee Hartman?[edit]

It's not that Hartman's work doesn't belong in Wikipedia, but I've never heard of it and it certainly doesn't merit a mention alongside Chomsky and Halle in the history of phonology. Someone should move it to its own page, it deserves a link at most from this page. Putting it here isn't information, it's advertising. The only reason I didn't move it already is that I don't know enough about it to go putting up a new page for it, and I didn't want to delete it outright without discussion.

Ncmc 11:19, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]