Talk:Russian cruiser Vladimir Monomakh/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Starstriker7 (talk · contribs) 07:46, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
I'll do this review. --Starstriker7(Talk) 07:46, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Criterion 1[edit]
- Can "economical range" be wikilinked?
- No, but I can drop economical if that word's the problem.
- I think its definition can be derived from the context well enough. Don't worry about it. --Starstriker7(Talk) 17:07, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
- No, but I can drop economical if that word's the problem.
- Can "9-pounder" be wikilinked?
- I don't even know what the official name of the gun is, much less enough data to build an infobox.
- You can wikilink the Russian Pacific Fleet earlier in the Career section, in the second paragraph rather than the fourth one.
- Done.
- "Once at Vladivostok Captain Oskar Stark was appointed commander" - Comma between Vladivostok and Captain.
- Done.
- Is there a difference between the terms "wintered" and "overwintered"?
- No, but I've rephrased overwintered.
- That reads a bit easier now. --Starstriker7(Talk) 17:07, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
- No, but I've rephrased overwintered.
- "reached Kronstadt in August where the ship" - Comma between August and where.
- What nation owned the Crown of Aragon? Was the ramming an accident, or was it done on purpose? Also, can the ship be wikilinked?
- Nationality and the type of ship of Crown of Aragon aren't given in my sources. Clarified that it was accidental. If I knew what type of ship it was then I could create a redlink for the ship. As is I don't see a point.
- "hull near the No.2 coal bunker" - Space between No. and 2.
- Done.
- What were the Sado Maru and Manchu Maru (as in, what nationality were they, and what types of ship were they?) If they were Japanese ships, then would it be more appropriate to say that the crew was captured, not rescued? Also, can the ships be wikilinked?
- Done. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:04, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
- You are welcome. I'm passing the article now. --Starstriker7(Talk) 17:07, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
- Done. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:04, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
Criterion 2[edit]
All clear here.
Criterion 3[edit]
This criterion is met.
Criterion 4[edit]
The article is neutral and unbiased.
Criterion 5[edit]
The article is and has been stable.
Criterion 6[edit]
- Since the infobox picture is dated, can the second image in the Russo-Japanese War section also be dated?
- Done.