Talk:Mel-frequency cepstrum

I am not sure, but I think that MFCC must be computed on the cepstrum, not the spectrum. That means that it is necessary to compute the log of the Mel scaled spectrum before applying the DCT. Am I wrong ? Adoudoux 10:00, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your main point is correct - it should be the log amplitudes - thanks for pointing this out. (Your turn of phrase re cepstrum vs spectrum is a bit bizarre - the MFCC is a type of cepstrum, but it is still calculated based on a spectrum, not on another cepstrum.) I'll add the log into the recipe. --mcld 10:43, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Sorry, I was wrong. I wanted to say "cepstrum must be calculated by computing the DCT of the log-(Mel-scaled)spectrum. Thanks for the change ! Adoudoux 06:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think there is an error in the reference to the thesis of Pols:

^ L. C. W. Pols (1966), "Spectral Analysis and Identification of Dutch Vowels in Monosyllabic Words," Doctoral dissertion, Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

it was written in 1977 according to his website:

http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/pols/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.202.69.187 (talk) 09:34, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mel-frequency cepstrum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:02, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]