Talk:Malaikottai Vaaliban

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 21 January 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Malaikottai Valiban to Malaikottai Vaaliban. The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 21 January 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Now that the only opposition has been blocked, there is no need for the discussion. UtherSRG (talk) 01:15, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Malaikottai Valiban → Malaikottai Vaaliban – Correct title has two "a"s. See this tweet and the info on the poster's file page. UtherSRG (talk) 13:33, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Film and WikiProject India have been notified of this discussion. UtherSRG (talk) 13:33, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support: No need for discussion. User:CallistoR7 blatantly moved the page to an incorrect spelling without research (poster) and against the previous "sourced" move without providing any source or abiding WP:PCM. This can be directly reverted as an undiscussed move.--The Doom Patrol (talk) 16:09, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I could just revert the revert, which would trigger an RM anyway. Better to just hash this out. Other information may come to light from CallistoR7 or others. UtherSRG (talk) 16:49, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Actually.... Since CallistoR7 has just been sock blocked, I'll just be moving this back anyway. - UtherSRG (talk) 01:14, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.