Talk:Idomeneus of Crete

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Greece Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mythology Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pronunciation[edit]

Stress in this name should fall on the second syllable, which should have a short o (/ɒ/). Kwamikagami's change to the third syllable certainly ought to be wrong, and his suggested pronunciation of his stressed e as /ɪ/ is downright mystifying. On the other hand, I do agree with Kwamikagami that the ending -eus should appear as /iəs/, rather than the /juːs/ prescribed (but surely not practised) by a recent wave of classicists. /juːs/ would generally be impossible in names like Odysseus, Perseus or Theseus, because here -eus would be absolutely unstressed (not secondarily stressed), and furthermore /juː/ in this position would palatalize, as in tonsure */ˈtonsjʊr/ → /ˈtonʃər/. So any alleged */ˈpɝːsjuːs/, for example, would inevitably have become */ˈpɝːʃəs/, whereas we know that the real pronunciation used by actual English speakers is /ˈpɝːsiəs/.

For Idomeneus, I say /aɪˈdɒmɪˌniəs/, which sounds fine, works well with English syllable structure, and recalls the normal English way of rendering the name of the opera Idomeneo (/aɪˌdɒmɪˈneɪɵʊ/). However, I can't find a direct source for the pronunciation /aɪˈdɒmɪˌniəs/ as yet, so for now I'm giving the imperfect prescription of /aɪˈdɒmɪnˌjuːs/ published in Fagles. Q·L·1968 ☿ 11:12, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The stressed /ɪ/ was probably a typo.

Greek names are normally given Latin stress in English. Since both Es are short, the Latin stress would be on the antepenult, Idoméneus, like caduceus, unless this is an established exception. Pre-antepenultimate stress is unusual is classical names. A stressed o would require a /ju:s/ pronunciation for it to be the antepenult, as here, but it still would not have been the antepenult in Latin. That would only have happened if it were abbreviated from Idómenéus, but that would still have been wrong, as the last e was epsilon, not eta. If Idoméneus is the standard pronunciation, we should note that it's idiosyncratic. kwami (talk) 12:27, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For the purposes of Latin stress, I think eu would be considered a diphthong generally. In English the unstressed eu ought to turn up as /iə/, which is bisyllabic for me but might be a diphthong for others (RP speakers for example?). Caduceus is stressed on the second syllable (the penult, to my way of thinking) because the first u is long (cādūceus), making the second syllable heavy. If, as you mention below, Idoméneus "would be expected in poetry", then perhaps I've got hold of the wrong end of the stick. (Mind you, I could imagine that Latin might have both bisyllabic eü and monosyllabic eu; after all, Latin has Menelāüs without an au diphthong. Greek ηυ should turn up in Latin as ēu, which must necessarily be bisyllabic, I think, shouldn't it?) Q·L·1968 ☿ 13:18, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It does seem to be somewhat idiosyncratic. If you check out A key to the classical pronunciation of Greek, Latin, and scripture proper names p 68 on Google Books, they give your stress pattern as the preferable one and discuss how it's a bit weird. They have I-dom′e-ne-us as the 2nd pronunciation, an mention in the notes that their first alternate (Idominéus) "must be incorrect". They also mention that Idomíneus would be expected in poetry, but don't list it in the heading. So we're left with the oddity of applying Latin stress rules while keeping the Greek diphthong, then breaking up the diphthong as in Latin. kwami (talk) 12:40, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well done! Yes, it's at all events a very odd name. Q·L·1968 ☿ 13:18, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, where would you place the stress on Bitius, Hodios (I don't know whether the iotas were long), Oceax, Peiroos, and Theotes? kwami (talk) 13:09, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, good question. I think I would stress them all on the antepenult: /ˈbɪtiəs/, /ˈhɵʊdiɵʊs/, /ˈɵʊʃiæks/, /ˈpɪrɵʊəs/, /ˈθiːətiːz/. But I'm mentally retranslating Peiroos as Pirous, and then shortening the vowel – for some reason /ˈpaɪrɵʊəs/ seems funny to me ... though perhaps I could reconcile myself to it. Why would I palatalize Oceax but not Bitius? Hard to say. Does ambisyllabicity weaken my inclination to palatalize a t, perhaps? Q·L·1968 ☿ 13:18, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think I found at least stress assignment for all but Oceax, but I'll change the vowel in Peiroos to /ˈpɪroʊəs/. (You are of course right about the vowel: short in an open antepenult. I've been reading too many botanical names.) kwami (talk) 14:05, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The warrant for /aɪˈdɒmɪniəs/ from the cited sources is meagre, and in English that preproparoxytone accentuation would be highly eccentric for a word of that phonological shape. /aɪˈdɒmɪnjuːs/ is the sole pronunciation given by Utter (1918) (īdŏmˊē̇nius) (and also the sole pronunciation given by Fagles, “eye-do'-men-yoos”). Walker & Trollope (1830: 68) give /aɪdɒmɪˈniːəs/ (I-dom-e-neˊus) and secondarily /aɪˈdɒmɪniəs/ (I-domˊe-ne-us) but in the associated discussion state a preference for /aɪˈdɒmɪnjuːs/ (I-domˊe-neus) over /aɪdɒmɪˈniːəs/ (I-dom-e-neˊus); the ninth edition (Walker 1830: 69) gives /aɪdɒmɪˈniːəs/ (I-dom-e-neˊus) and secondarily /aɪˈdɒmɪnjuːs/ (I-domˊe-neus) and again affirms a preference for the latter. The only pronunciation I have heard in general usage is /aɪdɒmɪˈniːəs/, which both the spelling and the analogy of Idomeneo favour, but on balance the cited sources would tend to point to /aɪˈdɒmɪnjuːs/. Andjamin (talk) 13:34, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You write "preproparoxytone accentuation would be highly eccentric". Please see WP:NOR. --Omnipaedista (talk) 15:57, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Apollodorus[edit]

I went ahead and got rid of the "the Athenian" after Apollodorus because that is not the person who is the author of the book in question.

Apollodorus vs Vergil vs Servius[edit]

It says, "A later tradition, preserved by the mythographer Apollodorus" then links to https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=iau.31858052742800&view=1up&seq=406&q1=Idomeneus. This link says that Apollodorus was driven out by Leuceus, who killed his wife and daughter. Then it says that Servius, in an addendum to The Aeneid, clarifies the story about sacrificing his son to Poseidon. That's like 200 years after Apollodorus. I'm updating the article to reflect the source. Orluvoq (talk) 18:50, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]