Talk:Helicopter flight rescue system

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the rotorcraft project.

On 22 August 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Helicopter rescue. The result of the discussion was not moved.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Helicopter Flight Rescue System. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150419023320/http://www.verticalmag.com/digital_issue/2015/v14i2/files/82.html to http://www.verticalmag.com/digital_issue/2015/v14i2/files/82.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:14, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 22 August 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Title converted into sentence case. (closed by non-admin page mover) ❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 17:32, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Helicopter Flight Rescue System → Helicopter rescue – This seems like a simpler and more common name. If this is to stay at the current title, it should not be capitalised. GnocchiFan (talk) 18:20, 22 August 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 11:35, 30 August 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 20:47, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose While most of the references are broken, those that do exist, clearly reference HFRS, in full. Additionally it seems like this article is referring specifically to "the particular set of equipment". And since it appears to be a widely accepted acronym, it also seems like the fully capitalized is also appropriate to retain. TiggerJay (talk) 19:10, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
MOS:ACRO supports not capitalizing a term simply because it's sometimes shortened to an initialism. ~T P W 13:22, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
At least switch to sentence case. This does not appear to be the name of a single rescue program, but rather a type of program, and thus it is a common noun rather than a proper name. To do otherwise would be MOS:SIGCAPS. Wikipedia uses WP:SENTENCECASE. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 21:28, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

At least switch to sentence case see MOS:SIGCAPS per BarrelProof and MOS:CAPSACRS - we don't capitalise an expanded form of an acronym unless it is actually a proper noun. This appears to be a class of equipment (also known by another acronyms) - ie a common noun prhase. It is certainly not referring to a particular company's product. Cinderella157 (talk) 01:12, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Switch to sentence case - No opinion on the originally proposed move. Primergrey (talk) 03:47, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose proposed move. Support switch to sentence case. estar8806 (talk) ★ 03:59, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Switch to sentence case.~T P W 13:23, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose All. This is not a broad concept article, clearly. It seems to be about a very particular set of tools and it's unclear if it's notable. Swapping it to sentence case makes no sense as it's not the common name for anything. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 17:33, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: Consensus against move as proposed. Further discussion of whether "Helicopter flight rescue system" or "Helicopter Flight Rescue System" would be better is required. BilledMammal (talk) 11:35, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose this is about a particular technique, and not helirescue in general. -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 05:15, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: Same as last time: consensus against proposed target, but unclear consensus regarding the sentence case issue. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 20:47, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Even if it's a "particular technique", it should be lowercased. Please see MOS:DOCTCAPS. It is not a proper name in the linguistic sense. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 19:42, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.