Talk:Dragon Quest VI/GA1

GA Reassessment[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
As an article on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps list, I am reviewing this article. And from the looks of its current state, it doesn't look like GA material. Here's why:

~~There's no references in some sections in the article.~~
~~Some of its pictures seem unnessesary anyways.~~
~~In fact, some sections aren't nessesary.~~
And this actually reminds me of the Dragon Warrior III article, which isn't good since I delisted it as GA months ago.

So, one week or its delisted. GamerPro64 (talk) 22:47, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Specifics, especially for the unnessary sections and images?陣内 _Jinnai 23:15, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Where do I begin? For sections, there's Starter Classes, Hybrid Classes, Hidden Classes, Monsters, and maybe Antagonists. For pictures, all but the battle example picture. GamerPro64 (talk) 23:29, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed 2 images. The 4 remaining ones I believe are fine because 1: The first is the box cover which all video game articles use, the second is the battle menu which you also agreed was fine, the 3rd is an overland screenshot which depicts how the ones moves through the world which cannot be depicted via the previous screenshot and also how the characters follow you, especially with the wagon which is somewhat difficult to explain with words and 4, the manga volume is appropriate as it does not closely resemble the artwork of the game being done by a different artist (although I'd prefer volume 1). The number is also within the 3-5 limit set by the FAC as reasonable.陣内 _Jinnai 02:23, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That reminds me. The Manga section is too short. It should be expanded. GamerPro64 (talk) 02:33, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not familiar with it. You should message the user who broight this to the GA.
I have restructured and removed many sections in the article.陣内 _Jinnai 03:53, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Um well here I am, the culprit. To be honest about the manga section, I looked for hours for info and that's all I came up with back then. What do you do when such info can't be found? I'll look around again though, but I don't know if anything'll turn up. EVAUNIT-666 19:39, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In such a case you find a section to merge it with, in this case the closest thing would be to merge soundtracks and manag and just have "related media". The 2 citations needed could be done with {{cite video game}}. Not sure what DWM/DQM game had the DQ6 bosses in it.陣内 _Jinnai 23:09, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All sections now have citations. If you still think some statements need to be cited please indicate.陣内 _Jinnai 04:29, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks so much better. Needs some stuff cited though. But I'm gonna let it keep its GA status. GamerPro64 (talk) 20:32, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]