Talk:Duilio-class ironclad

Duilio-class ironclad has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 16, 2016. (Reviewed version).

Military history: Maritime / European / Italian / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)
	World War I task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Caio Duilio-class ironclad/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk · contribs) 23:22, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article looks pretty good, with only a few minor issues:

Citations are unecessary in the lead if the material is cited in the body.
- The specific line is not cited in the body.
Hyphenate ISBNs.
- Not necessary - someone who knows a lot more about this than I do pointed out that ISBN formatting is not standard, and since I don't know the specific formatting for each ISBN, I don't bother adding hyphens. For what it's worth, worldcat doesn't use hyphens either.
Shouldn't the first cite be a note?
- Not really worth splitting it off into its own section.
Link "guard ship"
- Already linked, both in the lead and the body.

--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 23:22, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing the article. Parsecboy (talk) 12:07, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Passing, Well done.!--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 20:52, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]