Talk:C and D-class destroyer/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 17:45, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Maybe add a couple images to the service section - right now it's pretty much a big "wall-o-text". This isn't a requirement for GA though, just a suggestion.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Everything looks to be in order, excellent work as usual, Sturmvogel. Parsecboy (talk) 17:45, 10 October 2011 (UTC)