Talk:Antoni Kępiński

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

An important figure[edit]

I recommend this article be included on the Wikipedia academic CD. Tcaudilllg (talk) 15:31, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Part of a series of articles on Socionics[edit]

I think that Kępiński shouldn't be linked mainly with socionics, because de facto he was never involved in development of socionics. (he's concepts were only inspiration) I propose that link to socionics should be on "see also" area, and connect him with series of articles about psychiatry. Why for example article about Carl Gustav Jung isn't also part of a series of articles about socionics? (I'm sorry for my English) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.18.7.205 (talk) 19:20, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. The associations developed here seem to redirect the focus from Kepinski to socionics. The latter has its own very good article, and should not annex this article to its detriment.

As for the "dubious" marker regarding the "mathematical theory of thinking" statement, it is quite correct. The statement is fatally vague and unsupportable as written. If it were to be replaced, I would suggest quoting the following from the "mathematical" section in the socionics article: "Since socionics is mathematically Base-16 and also a psychology of personality in the same way as the typology of Carl Jung and Myers–Briggs, it shares a similar degree of mathematical consistency, while enduring the same serious shortcomings in the experimental justification of these theories." But frankly I would prefer socionics be mentioned as an outgrowth with redirection to that article, and otherwise excised from here. Instead, more material on the IM theory would be called for. Drmcclainphd (talk) 15:34, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Antoni Kępiński. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928130624/http://images.katalogas.lt/maleidykla/Fil71/f44-49Kapusta.pdf to http://images.katalogas.lt/maleidykla/Fil71/f44-49Kapusta.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:47, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]