Aëdon is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Many Wikipedia editors are not able to rise above dictionary thinking, it often appears. Uncomprehending what "an encyclopedic treatment" might entail, they keep busy by breaking information into such small fragments they no longer make sense. This is quite a good example, concocted from a redirect to Itylus. --Wetman 06:01, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
In some regards you're right, but I think one good thing about what you say is this: if people add sources/citations, there can be compiled a fair amount of source material, and then someone can come along and turn the fragments into a good article. I write on here a lot, but a lot of the time, one source that I have only tells a small fraction of the story, and more sources and angles are needed. Fragments and bits don't make a good article, but they're a good starting point. JW (talk) 13:21, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
