Tabarra
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. (April 2008) |
| Part of a series on Aqidah |
|---|
 |
|
Including:
 Islam portal |
 |
Tabarra (Arabic: تبري) is the doctrine of disassociation with the enemies of the ahl al-bayt in Shia Islam. As Shia Muslims believe, they believe that the imamate is the inheritor of risala (apostleship), thus it is the protector of Islam. The Islamic prophet Muhammad introduced them (imams). Later every imam introduced and stipulated the next Imam. So, people who were obstacles to the Imamate and implementation of the true form of Islam and equally the people who were the enemies of ahl al-bayt are the enemies of God and it is necessary for all believers to dissociate from them.[citation needed]
Definition[edit]
Every Shia Muslim believes it to be their duty to dissociate themselves from the enemies of God and his Messengers. Muslims differ on whom to consider to be the enemies of God, Muhammad and the ahl al-bayt.
The doctrine of tabarra itself does not dictate whom to dissociate from or whom to associate with. It dictates the dissociation of those identified as enemies of Ahl al-bayt. The identification is up to every individual.
For example, some Shia may regard Umar and Mu'awiya as the enemy of Ahl al-Bayt. In that case, it becomes obligatory to dissociate oneself from Umar and Mu'awiya.
Quran[edit]
A Quranic verse that can be found that carries the same message as this doctrine.
A (declaration) of immunity from Allah and His Messenger, to those of the Pagans with whom ye have contracted mutual alliances:-
Baraatun is derived from the same consonantal root as tabarra.
Shia and Sunni differences[edit]
 | This article contains too many or overly lengthy quotations. (December 2010) |
Since Shias and Sunnis have different sources of hadith, they tend to come to different conclusions regarding whom the enemies of ahl al-bayt are. Tabarra is a flashpoint of Shia and Sunni controversies as the Sunnis concerning the Sahabah since Sunnis believe in the uprightness of all Sahaba while Shia do not.
Due to the Shia view of early Muslim history, the Shia scholar Muhammad Baqir Majlisi stated:
Regarding the doctrine of Tabarra, we believe that we should seek disassociation from four idols, namely, Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, and Mu'awiya; from four women, namely, A'isha, Hafsa, Hind, and Umm al-Hakam [a daughter of Hind], along with all their associates and followers. These are the worst creation of Allah. It is not possible to believe in Allah, His Messenger, and the Imams without disassociating oneself from their enemies.
— Reality of Certainty (Haqq al-Yaqīn) 2:519
Every Muslim believes that it is important to disassociate themselves from the enemies of Muhammad; however, Muslims differ upon who those are.
Shia also believe that this view was held by the descendants of Muhammad. Shia hold as authentic a narration attributed to Muhammad al-Baqir. He was reported to have replied to his disciple who had sought the Imam's opinion regarding Abu Bakr and Umar:
"What are you asking me about them (Abu Bakr and Umar)? Whoever among us (Ahl al-Bayt) or the progeny of Muhammad departed from this world, departed in a state of extreme displeasure with them. The elders among us admonished the younger ones to perpetuate it (extreme displeasure with them), Verily, the two of them have unjustly usurped our right. By Allah! These two were the first to settle on our (Ahl al-Bayt) necks . Therefore, may the la'nat (curse) of Allah, the Malaikah (angels) and of mankind be on the two of them.
— Kitabur Raudhah[clarification needed] Page 115
In the same book,[which?] on the same page appears the following:
"Verily these two elders (Abu Bakr and Umar) departed from this world without having made taubah for what they had perpetrated against Ameerul Mumineen Alayhis Salaam. In fact, they did not even think of us (of their wrongs against Hadhrat Ali). Therefore, the la'nat of Allah, the Malaikah and of mankind be on them."
— Kitabur Raudhah[clarification needed] Page 115
Since some Shia hold for narrations where the descendants of Muhammad cursed the first three caliphs, Shia also curse them (which does not literally mean using inappropriate terms for them, but rather asking God to withdraw His mercy from them) when doing tabarra.
Although all Shia agree to dissociate themselves from some of the sahaba, cursing them is disputed amongst Shia scholars. Influential modern-day Shia scholars, including Ali al-Sistani and Muhammad Husayn Fadl Allah, have ruled cursing of the Sahaba to be haram, so did the current Iranian supreme leader Ali Khamenei.[2] However, some other Shia scholars such as Yasser al-Habib have allowed cursing.
This added to the persecution of the Shias by the Sunnis. To protect themselves in times where their life were in jeopardy, Shias used the doctrine of taqiyya and were prevented from using tabarra in public. The similar concept used in Ibadi theology is the doctrine of al-Wala' wal-Bara' (al-wala’ being cognate with tawalla, and al-bara’ being cognate with tabarra).