On Monday 11 November 2002 04:43 pm, TMC wrote:
If it makes you feel any better, the gang considers
the intact windshields to be the "means of production"
through which broken windshields are produced.
Because the social class of "car owners" cannot use
their ownership of these means of production to exert
control over the gang, it is necessary for the gang to
take "possession" of the windshields while they put
they to the use of being smashed.
That's a bunch of relativistic morality crap. If somebody goes to the effort
of building something or working their ass-off to pay for something it is
absolutely wrong for somebody else to destroy that. Basic morality 101.
If this is your true position then their is no reason to try and reason with
you because your frame of reference is totally unreasonable.
-- Daniel Mayer (aka mav)